Students break down sentences to learn how the elements relate to each other. Emphasis is placed on elements key to clear writing such as subject-verb agreement, pronoun and antecedent agreement, and verb tense consistency.
Thirty years after a war that wounded its heart, 20 years after a scandal that scarred its conscience, 10 years after fiscal policies that ridiculed its sense of responsibility Essay on nature fury fairness, the country has nearly exhausted the qualities by which democracy survives and flourished.
As Americans we have Essay on nature fury to act more oppressed by freedom than invigorated by it, more concerned with freedom from rather than freedom to. We divide between the vast majority of us who -- out of futility, confusion or indifference -- are so disengaged from democracy we never vote at all, and those of us who vote not to thoughtfully resolve complicated issues but to express our rage.
History is clear that democracy cannot long navigate a sea of national rage. Untempered by rationale and open-mindedness, fury eventually consumes democracy rather than nourishes it, because it overwhelms our tolerance, our willingness to be reasonably informed, our determination to hold ourselves accountable for what we decide.
Most important, it overwhelms our basic faith in democracy itself and our belief in the individual freedoms that are inviolate to the power of the majority, identified by the Declaration of Independence as endowed by God and codified in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
We display less patience, in other words, with other Americans. A deep freeze has settled in the American soul. The nation gets meaner and more petty until rage is the only national passion left -- and then it is anger not at those on top, which is the anger America was born of, but at those on the bottom.
Increasingly, we view individual freedom not as the fundamental building block of collective freedom but as an affront to collective sensibility or security. We are encouraged by talk-show commentators to regard the most basic precepts of democracy as sentimental luxuries at best or, at worst, as legalistic refuge for vicious criminals, social parasites and moral scum.
We find indignant solace in the single greatest myth of the contemporary political landscape, which holds that the problem with the country is the government and the politicians and the process as a whole.
This myth, that the process has grown helplessly out of touch with what we really want and feel and need, is the opposite of the truth.
The truth is that we are the problem with America. Confronted with change that is truly profound or revolutionary, which is to say unavoidably painful and disorienting, we scurry back to the status quo that so infuriated us to begin with, and that not so long ago we claimed was unacceptable.
When they speak of unpleasant realities and tell us things must necessarily get harder before they get easier -- Bob Dole on the subject of the deficit and Bruce Babbitt on taxes during the presidential campaign ofPaul Tsongas on the economy inWarren Rudman and Bob Kerrey on entitlements, William J.
Bennett and Jack Kemp on illegal immigration -- we dismiss them at the polls or denounce them from the streets. From political season to political season we demand our problems be solved and then make ruthlessly clear we expect someone else to pay the price.
We say we want government to be smaller, but we never name government programs directly affecting us that we would be willing to forgo. People in the cities cry for cutting farm subsidies, people in the suburbs call for cutting inner-city programs.
To suggest we are hypocrites sounds elitist. It subverts the populism on which both the Right and Left capitalize, and offends the professed egalitarianism of a news media already cowed by accusations of liberal bias.
Our common sense admits that national economic survival is not served by cutting taxes and is not possible without addressing the epic components that make up most of the national budget, which one segment or another of the public has declared sacrosanct: That is because we have secretly come to fear and resent that the American dream itself may be a delusion.
This is the source of our rage, and of the rage that would devour democracy. It is a rage at ourselves, which we can barely stand to live with but which is the only thing that seems to pump blood through the national heart anymore.
It is a rage at contradictions that confound and beset us. Though America has won the Cold War, we grow spiritually lethargic: International triumph appears not to have so much consolidated our power as dissipated it, and perhaps revealed its uselessness.
Though the economy improves, we grow financially insecure: Though the crime rate has dropped, we grow physically vulnerable:There was some effort to ascribe to Trump magical powers.
In an early conversation — half comic, half desperate — Bannon tried to explain him as having a particular kind of Jungian brilliance. Printed from kaja-net.com On the Trial of Jesus.
The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of the many issues and questions. Envy (from Latin invidia) is an emotion which "occurs when a person lacks another's superior quality, achievement, or possession and either desires it or wishes that the other lacked it"..
Aristotle defined envy as pain at the sight of another’s good fortune, stirred by “those who have what we ought to have.” Bertrand Russell said that envy was one of the most potent causes of unhappiness.
In order for us to reduce getting spam from junk-mailer programs, click on the e-mail button, and then before e-mailing us, remove the '+' symbol from our address to make sure you reach us.
The Destructive Nature of Time: The Sound and the Fury Essay Words 8 Pages The passage and oppressive nature of time in one of the most important themes in William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury. Rather like baby turtles, true gardeners are born impatient to get on with the business of life, except that they make for the earth rather than the sea.